As you drive around Vermont, every now and then you'll encounter a sign that says “Poor Farm Rd” (or some other variation of it). You may be curious as to just what you may stumble upon if choosing that particular road. For those who are curious, most likely the “poor farm” is long gone and only the name remains.
Vermont's poor farms show how the state helped the poor in the late 1700s and early 1800s. These places were set up by a 1797 law. They helped towns take care of the poor and sick for over 170 years. Poor farms were a new way to help the needy. They were better than old ways of helping the poor. For a long time, they were key in helping Vermont's poor, sick, and elderly.
Key Takeaways
The Sheldon poor farm is a great example of this system. It was run by several towns working together. This shows how Vermont communities came together to solve big problems.
- Vermont's poor farm system started with a 1797 law
- Towns had to look after their poor, sick, and elderly people
- Poor farms were a new way to help the poor instead of old methods
- The system ended in 1968 when the laws were repealed
- Sheldon poor farm showed how towns worked together to help the poor
The Origins of Poor Farms in Vermont
Vermont's history shows a long commitment to helping the poor. Early laws set the stage for how communities handled poverty. They led to the creation of poor farms.
The 1797 Vermont Law
In 1797, Vermont changed how towns dealt with poor relief. This law made towns responsible for their poor residents. It stopped people from moving to get help elsewhere. The law also created the overseer of the poor to manage these efforts.
Influence of English Poor Laws
The 1600s English poor laws influenced Vermont's approach. These laws made local parishes responsible for their poor. This idea guided Vermont towns in poverty relief for many years.
Early Poor Relief Methods
Towns used various methods to help the poor. Some “hired out” poor people to work. Others gave out food, clothes, and other basics. Poor farms became a common solution over time. These farms offered a place for the poor to live and work. The overseer of the poor was strict, ensuring help went only to those in real need.
The Establishment of Poor Farms Across Vermont
In the early 19th century, Vermont saw a rise in poor farms. These farms were a cost-effective way to help people struggling with poverty during tough economic times. Towns across the state started these facilities to look after their poor residents.
First Poor Farms in the State
Burlington was the first to open a poorhouse in 1816. Middlebury followed in 1822, and Newbury set up its poor farm in 1837. Sheldon took a special step in 1834 by starting a joint poor farm with help from several communities.
Reasons for Poor Farm Creation
Economic challenges led to the growth of poor farms. The Panic of 1817 hit Vermont hard, leaving many people without enough money. Then, the arrival of Irish immigrants in the 1840s and 1850s added more pressure, making towns set up poor farms.
Town-Specific Examples
Each town in Vermont had its own way of starting poor farms. Burlington was quick to adopt them because of its growing city life. Middlebury's farm became a model for smaller towns. Newbury showed the ongoing need for these places. Sheldon's joint effort showed how rural areas worked together to support their poor.
A number towns in Vermont had poor farms, which were established to care for the impoverished, elderly, and infirm residents. Here are some specific examples:
- Newport: The City Farm in Newport was a significant poor farm, with detailed historical accounts provided by descendants of individuals linked to the farm
- Sheldon: The Sheldon Poor Farm was a notable establishment, created through a joint effort by the towns of St. Albans, Swanton, Sheldon, and Fairfield. It operated until 1968, making it the last remaining poor farm in Vermont.
- Burlington: Burlington opened its first poor house in 1816 and later established its own poor farm.
- Middlebury: Middlebury established a poor house in 1822 and purchased land for a poor farm by 1825.
- Chittenden County: In 1916, Chittenden County had five poor farms located in Burlington, Charlotte, Colchester, Milton, and the Union Poor Farm in Williston
These poor farms were a common feature across Vermont, with many towns setting up their own facilities to care for their needy residents
Life on Vermont's Historical Poor Farms
Vermont's poor farms were a key part of the state's history. They were where many people lived through hard times. The lives of those on poor farms were filled with farm work and feeling cut off from towns.
Poor farm residents worked long hours in tough conditions. They took care of crops, animals, and the farm. Everyone who could work was expected to help out.
Residents of poor farms were often older individuals, with many being over the age of sixty-five by the early 1900s. The facilities were typically located away from town centers, often on less desirable land, which contributed to a sense of isolation. The environment was not always welcoming; for instance, recollections from former residents describe arriving at these farms to dark, cold conditions that were intimidating and uninviting.
These farms were far from town, making life there isolating. Many were on remote roads, away from the hustle and bustle of cities. This made the residents feel disconnected. The shame of living on a poor farm made some hide their situation, even when they needed help.
Conditions varied on poor farms in Vermont. Some had basic food and clothes. Others had holiday celebrations that brought happiness. Yet, the hard times often outweighed the good for those living there.
The “Worthy” and “Unworthy” Poor: A Societal Divide
In Vermont, social attitudes shaped how people saw and treated the poor. This divide affected life on poor farms and strengthened prejudices.
Defining the “Worthy Poor”
Those seen as victims of circumstance were called the “worthy poor.” This included widows, orphans, and those who couldn't work due to illness or disability. People felt sorry for them and gave them more support.
Treatment of the “Unworthy Poor”
On the other hand, the “unworthy poor” got harsh treatment. This term was for able-bodied people who didn't work, seen as lazy or lacking in work ethic. They faced discrimination and got less help on poor farms.
Impact on Poor Farm Residents
The divide between worthy and unworthy poor changed life on poor farms. Those seen as unworthy had tougher rules and more work. This view made poverty seem like a moral issue, not a complex social problem. The idea that working could prove one's worth led to demanding work for everyone, no matter their situation.
Poor Farm Management and Oversight
In Vermont, poor farms were closely watched by town officials. These officials were key in managing the farms. They chose overseers of the poor to handle daily tasks. These overseers decided who could live on the farm and how to look after them.
The success of helping the poor depended a lot on the overseers. Kind overseers made life better for those living on the farm. But harsh overseers could make things worse. Hartford was different, making sure the poor were well cared for, not just looking for the cheapest option.
Overseers of the poor had a tough job. They had to meet the needs of the farm residents while keeping an eye on the town's budget. This meant planning carefully and being resourceful. Good management meant using what they had wisely to help those in need.
Economic Impacts of Poor Farms on Vermont Towns
Poor farms were key in shaping town budgets and the local economy in Vermont. They were set up as a cost-effective way for towns to take care of the poor. The farms' effects on farming and finances varied across the state.
Cost-Effectiveness for Communities
Many Vermont towns saw poor farms as a smart solution for welfare needs. They offered housing and work to the needy, easing the financial load on towns. The idea was that these farms could help cover the costs of helping poor residents.
Agricultural Contributions
Some poor farms boosted local farming. For instance, Hardwick's poor farm was a big success, producing milk and veggies for the town. This farming helped the local economy and brought in money for the farm.
Financial Challenges
By the 1930s, many poor farms were struggling financially. Keeping these places up was often more expensive than their benefits, leading to closures and sales of the land. This change had a big effect on town budgets, forcing communities to find new ways to help the poor.
Vermont's Historical Poor Farms: A Closer Look
Vermont's poor farms have a rich history. They were key in shaping communities across the state. Let's look at some examples that show the varied lives of those living there and the hurdles these places faced.
Hardwick's poor farm was known for its hillside spot and top-notch cow herd. The farm's quality livestock helped it succeed, but the hilly terrain made farming hard. This mix of benefits and challenges was common in Vermont's poor farms, showing the state's tough landscape.
In Sheldon, several towns worked together to run a poor farm. This teamwork let smaller towns share costs and resources. The Sheldon farm faced problems like fires that forced it to rebuild. These challenges show how Vermont's rural areas kept up their social support systems.
Burlington's poor relief changed over time. The city moved its poorhouses away from the town center. This move showed a shift in how society viewed poverty and a wish to keep the poor out of cities. Burlington's story shows the complex link between city growth and social welfare in Vermont's biggest city.
The buildings of these poor farms were often alike, built for efficiency and practicality. Big central buildings were homes for both residents and staff. The land around was used for farming. This design aimed to offer shelter and help people be self-sufficient through farm work.
The Decline of the Poor Farm System
The poor farm system in Vermont slowly started to fade away as new ways to help the poor came into place. This change was a big step in how society dealt with poverty and helped those in need.
State and Federal Welfare Programs
Social Security in the 1930s was a key factor in changing public aid. It gave money to the elderly and disabled, making them less dependent on local poor farms. More welfare programs followed, creating a wider safety net for those at risk.
Evolving Social Attitudes
How people saw poverty changed during this time. They started to see social reform as a way to fight economic inequality. This new view led to kinder and more inclusive ways to help those in need.
Legislative Changes
In the 1960s, Vermont lawmakers decided to end the poor farm system. They passed laws that took away towns' power to run these places. This showed that most people thought central welfare programs were better at helping. By 1968, Vermont closed the poor farm chapter, starting a new era in social welfare.
Lasting Impact on Vermont Communities
Vermont's poor farms left a lasting mark on the state's community memory. Street names like “Poor Farm Road” remind us of this era. These names keep the local history alive, sparking talks on poverty awareness.
Old farm properties across Vermont tell a story of change in social services. Once full of life, now they stand as silent witnesses. They make us think about how communities helped their most vulnerable members.
The poor farm system's legacy shapes today's talks on social welfare. Vermont towns face modern poverty challenges but look to their past for answers. This history guides debates on community care and government support.
By looking at the poor farm era, Vermont communities learn about poverty's complexities. This knowledge helps shape today's social services. It ensures past mistakes are avoided and successful strategies are used. The impact of poor farms on Vermont's social life shows why we must keep local history alive for the future.
Lessons from the Poor Farm Era
Vermont's poor farm system teaches us a lot about today's social welfare reform. These places showed us how important it is to care for each other in our communities. They taught us that local efforts can make a big difference in fighting poverty.
Reflections on Local Responsibility
The poor farm system made towns take part in helping those in need. This created a strong sense of community in fighting poverty. Today, it's still key to mix local efforts with state and federal help for a full support system.
Evolution of Social Welfare
After poor farms, new ways to help people in need came along. Now, we focus on dignity, empowerment, and lasting change. We've learned from the past to tackle poverty's deep causes and help people right away.
Conclusion
Lessons from poor farms help shape today's poverty fights. Now, we aim for solutions that don't shame people, help them stand on their own, and offer specific support. By using these lessons and new ideas, we can fight poverty in a kind and effective way.
Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe to our email list for the latest news!
